Dungeons and Dead Ends: How mixed news sparked fantasy wars

Dungeons & Dragons is an organization that will soon celebrate its 50th anniversary, and it is undoubtedly one of the most influential and successful games of all time. Over the decades, the game has been constantly changing, and various rule sets and arrangements have inspired fans to endlessly go back and forth about when is the “best” or what represents the “real” D&D experience. Of course, the personal answer is whatever version you like. But change has always been part of D&D, which is why it is still an important factor in a vibrant and successful fantasy world.

The current Dungeons and Dragons design team announced last year that they will study some of the ideas in the D&D legend, basically, Remove materials such as racial stereotypesThis may have been triggered by the 2016 Curse of Strahd event, which was criticized by Vistani, a group based on the Roma metaphors that have been in D&D since the landmark Ravenloft module in 1983 . Times have changed, D&D publisher Wizards of the Coast then revised part of Strahd’s curse in 2020 to resolve the dispute.

Sage Advice is an occasional column by Jeremy Crawford, chief rule designer of D&D, where he explains the various changes and the reasons why the design team made these changes. A recent column is called “Book update“It has caused a lot of negative attention, and some people are upset that WotC is purging old knowledge and ethnic alliances because they think there is no good reason.

(Image source: Esther Derksen via Getty Images)

In the above context, WotC has become more and more cautious about the historical aspects of D&D, and people’s views on these aspects will be completely different in 2021. A particularly worrying hotspot is the idea that race is inherently evil because it has an impact on racial stereotypes in real life: for example, dark-skinned drow are inherently cruel and evil ideas.