Prerequisite comment: FX Hulu shows the hardships of white people

To some people, the world seems more gloomy, darker, and more worrying than it used to be. This anxiety about the human condition is at the core of why well-known experts are worried about “abolition of culture” or about censorship. For them, traveling around the world should be easier. Now it is not. So what’s the difference?

like Fringe area, However, the story is inspired by noisy social media debates, every episode of the Hulu anthology series FX premise Presents an independent moral story about a clear modern concern. Usually, there will be ironic or absurd turns. Evidence was found in the background of a white sex tape that could save the victim of police brutality from imprisonment-would he choose to be the ally he said, even if it meant publicly humiliating himself? The father of the school shooting victim started working for the gun lobby-why did he choose to do this? One of the richest people alive provided a business opportunity for his childhood bully: designing a butt plug that could “change the world”-is this a prank or a real proposal?

Each episode is introduced by the series creator and predecessor office Star BJ Novak, but his introduction has not yet appeared in the projector provided to critics.This is a frustrating omission, because the biggest problem premise raises is a framework. According to promotional materials, Novak’s goal is to boldly solve major problems in the world today.Although the author may want the story to speak for itself and stimulate thoughtful dialogue without simple answers, it is difficult to judge premiseI don’t know how he motivated people to accept these stories. What does he think is the important question raised by his story? How seriously does he want people to accept stories about docking plug design and social media blowouts?

premise Claiming to be “The Anthology of the Present”, which creates a vague sense of kinship with Charlie Brooke’s technical warning series Black mirrorBut for the most part, Novak’s show feels like a short film about how privileged white people navigate the world in ways that have recently become tricky. Its story derives tension from the dynamic changes of power and privilege: a young keyboard man (Ben Pratt) can put money on his lips, but at the expense of his dignity. Is it fair? If a comfortable and quite successful writer (Lola Kirke) is pierced by a despicable Instagram commenter in her affirmation bubble, should the commenter face the emotional loss they cause?

Almost all of these conflicts are the result of privileges facing people outside of privileges. Almost everyone is related to their interests and concerns. There is only one, “the moment of silence”, which resolves gun lobbying and truly wrestles with an agency. These stories weigh the morality of individual behavior in a world where the strong are asymmetrical.

Each episode has wonderful sparks, a wonderful confrontation that is both low-key and cathartic. Considering the 30-minute running time of the episode, they are set up very well.But although this simplicity is very suitable premiseThe provocation, it damages its subject. The big problem conflicts with the small format, reducing each story to an empathy test. Every episode will ask you if you can understand why every character played by a famous actor will do what you just saw.

Photo: Alyssa Moran/FX

Of course you can-they are all great actors. But in fact, when solving a problem, you still need to check the power that pushes individual players, and try to avoid giving people a sense of preaching. premise Putting his role in a rhetorical vacuum, the audience is asked to drink deeply from the well that the attentive audience knows has been poisoned. The impression of Novak’s show is like the work of a self-proclaimed peacemaker. He wants people to recognize each other’s views and get along well, but at the same time is a person who refuses to express any beliefs of his own.

This is premiseThe fundamental problem: Even peacemakers have beliefs and prejudices.Those who “just ask questions” are choose What questions to ask. And those who just want us to get along well? Although they may make sense-to quote Olivia Rodrigo, barbarous -It is also possible that emotions are driven by the desire to return to a peaceful life, where they do not have to consider the plight of other people.

The adopted method of packet capture premise It doesn’t do any good-every episode of it doesn’t explain why the world looks so worrying, it’s just taken for granted.But who is full of it for? These episodes provide an answer (people who were comfortable until recently), but it may not be what they want.For most of these characters, the world used to be It’s much simpler. At the most vulnerable time, premise Not interested in why at all. If so, someone might accuse it of standing aside.